This page will remain up
until all deletions are completed.
Failed Predictions Of MAGA Astrologist
DiCocco predicted that Marine Le Pen would win the
French election. Oops!
DiCocco predicted a Le Pen Win multiple times, including in 2 YouTube videos.
In the Facebook post below DiCocco, who is the only one who
can "make astrology great," predicts Le Pen anew.
He also got "Le Pen wins" from his Tarot Card reading (just to
snide, pompous DiCocco in his dime store costume hat made sure to mock
for predicting Le Pen -- just before he himself jumped on the Le Pen
DiCocco mocked other astrologers for predicting Le
Pen. Above he puts the word "astrologer" in quotes for Barry Goddard.
He states "I'll tell you right now that Le Pen's natal charts and
transits...do NOT look good at all for her."
So he's always
flip-flopping. After he saw others predicting Le Pen, DiCocco jumped on
the Le Pen
bandwagon with both feet. He made two
videos predicting her.
But in the above post
the "voice of the cosmos" wants to wait
until it's narrowed down to two before he tries a prediction.
mocking Goddard for an analysis he called "very poor and scanty"
DiCocco placed huge significance on a trifle like Le Pen's
a mathematical point proposed by an ancient Arabic
mathematician-astrologer (along with hundreds of other "parts") that
no experience watching and which is not even
reliable significator of external things by those who have
studied Arabic Parts. (And as usual, he
points to no examples where the P-O-F
figured in other cases or election wins, but simply asserts.)
nervous to predict, DiCocco tried to put an out into his prediction;
some fail-deniability, by stating there might be "election fraud."
However, this won't fly, for the purpose of an astrological prediction is
to say what happens -- in this case who wins
-- along with whatever factors the astrologer may be involved or
in the picture or the background such as "fraud," "media support,"
he was wrong DiCocco, The Voice of the Cosmos who knows 'the
true astrology that always predicts,'
said his fail was "not
a big deal whatsoever." The only one who can "make
astrology great" now
takes shelter with astrologers
he attacked and mocked, saying 'They were also wrong!'
In two Freudian slips he says:
"The show must go on" and "Now to carry on with business
DiCocco is now getting slaughtered so badly in Comments for the two
videos he had to disable comments. Ever
the slippery eel, the "Voice of the Cosmos" now claims he had
faulty birth data. (How incompetent! How negligent!)
Speaking of himself in the Third Person DiCocco writes: "GianPaolo
predicted Le Pen;
however, due to new evidence, that prediction is null and void. BOTH
candidates have faulty birth data." No
honest astrologer would affirm there are major differences between the
two Le Pen charts, one at 11 am and the other 11:20 (the one
DiCocco negligently used). They have the same planets-in-houses (except
Pluto in 11th vs. 12th) and the same house rulers. Both candidates would have been
having the same planetary transits and progressions on election day and during this
period. Le Pen would have still had transiting Mercury conjunct her
Saturn on election day (a giveaway: you get bad news and goodbyes
then), and Macron would have had the same raft of positive
transits on election day, including Jupiter all over his Pluto during
this period. If
anything, the 11 a.m. Le Pen chart (which DiCocco did not use), is the
stronger natal chart as it features a Sun/Mercury sextile to her
ascendant. There are no substantive differences that would have
caused DiCocco to predict differently, as his prediction was just
copycatting other astrologers in the first place.
Freaky Fact: The Kook makes extreme attacks against Locational
Julian Lee who he calls "negligent" for having an incorrect birth year
for him, though Lee sincerely tried to help him and was not paid.
Notwithstanding that faulty data Lee's prediction
of career improvements came true for DiCocco in California,
DiCocco acknowledges he attained the best position
and pay of
his life, plus went from being a nobody to being famous in a
career of astrological pundit and enfant
In one of his first videos DiCocco dances around his
bedroom in Pasadena with a toilet plunger
while wrapped in the American flag and threatens viewers with
it. Was it a sign? Another alibi used by DiCocco and his groupies is "Le Pen really won." They spin DiCocco's miss with lines like: "Le Pen didn't want to win, so she threw the election by making herself unpleasant in the debate, so she really won" or "Macron didn't really win because their was fraud" etc. But the goal of the astrologer is, again, to predict "what happens" in this messy, complex world. Thus an astrologer would say: "Macron wins, through fraud, a band plays a marching tune, the weather is sunny." Or "Le Pen loses, and it was because she wanted to, a dog barks" or "Macron wins, and it's because he had money and media behind him, but he's really a body double" etc. DiCocco's goal was predict who wins,
whatever might be the surrounding factors of that win.
Fun fact: Knowing he merely lucked out with his "big" Trump prediction,
DiCocco is insecure in his use of astrology.
With the French election just two days away and feeling nervous about
he resorted to Tarot card reading (suddenly a Tarot expert):
says his Tarot reading predicts a Le Pen win. Still got it wrong!
Will Runes be his next specialty and forte?
The French Election is just one more fail in DiCocco's growing list
predicted an "attack
on American soil" to take place in
"late December 2016
to early January 2017. His phrase suggested significant aggression from
or at least a major terrorist event such as a serious bomb,
and was attended by gravity and portentous music. "Breaking News!"
The only thing DiCocco could point to was one more lone gunman incident,
common nowadays, a Jan. 6 Fort Lauderdale shooting that took
(Many mass shootings have higher casualties.) DiCocco stated that he
prediction from "the cosmos." Note how direly worded it is. "Warning the people of the United
States and the world at large." It would "unfold"
like a major event.
The shooter-of-five was an American, and it's
already forgotten today. DiCocco
insisted that this common event fulfilled his
exaggerated, dramatically worded prediction.
(Even though he was "four days off.")
Likely, Chicago alone had more shootings that day.
In the following posts from that thread, DiCocco is seen spinning that
common event as validation.
He digs himself in deeper to his mess by telling us to "expect a higher
of these events"
between January and mid-March 2017.
probability" is going to occur. How about that for not committing to
Nobody can disprove whether a "higher probability" just passed
The "cosmos" was too shy to say: "There will be
more of these events." Or even "Expect more."
And there was no increase.
This site tracking shootings shows that
January, Feb, and March were very average months for shootings.
Where's this dramatic "attack on American soil"? The same site shows
that (click the bar)
from January 6 until March 22 -- the period DiCocco specified above --
no other shooting with five or more deaths took place.
a foil star for a double-fail.
DiCocco made dire predictions that the US navy would
suffer a serious attack
and he specified the dates of April 11 and 12 as the most likely
Note the dire wording and definite implications: "***WARNING...great
danger for the US Navy abroad..
...attack on foreign government institutions...
Particularly around April 11th, 12th...Is another attack imminent???... To the Department of Defense: BE
Raise all ships to the highest alert level allowed by international
DiCocco bases his entire credibility on the fact that he predicted a
if this winning of a coin toss (there were only 2 real possibilities)
proved greatness as an astrologer.
had huge crowds and Hillary was always falling over, and other
astrologers predicted it before him.
For example Astrologer Julian Lee, who helped DiCocco overcome his job
troubles and who DiCocco continually attacks,
predicted a Trump win back in July 2016. So did a few others.
DiCocco's late-in-the-game prediction, using garden variety
DiCocco's whole claim to fame, from which he hopes to build an empire
selling cups and shirts that say
"Make Astrology Great Again."
He appears to put a great deal of time and energy into pure marketing.
Though trying to build up a business by attacking other
DiCocco has been accused of foraging for other astrologers'
ideas and statements,
then presenting them as his own. This is mentioned in this blog. Julian Lee
has heard DiCocco taking phrases
and ideas that Lee presented in his reading to DiCocco,
presenting them as his
knowledge on the internet.
In the statement above DiCocco says "Astrologers know that the
quincunx is a lottt worse than a square."
One more bare assertion and fabrication. It would be hard to
find such a statement in astrological
literature. What he's doing is trying to quote Julian Lee
from his reading,
not anything generally agreed by astrologers. Then he makes another
original assertion about Mercury-Quincunx-Neptune,
but does not tell us who called it "the
ultimate lying aspect"
or where this is written. DiCocco pulls statements that have
no basis out of his ass.
Recently DiCocco appears to have copycatted other astrologers to make a
about the French election. After
two other astrologers predicted Marine Le Penn would
win, DiCocco mocked and abused them.
A week later, with round #1 a few days away and Le Pen polling high,
DiCocco shamelessly jumped on the bandwagon and also predicted
a Le Pen win.
This copycatting is even apparent in his failed "attack on American
YouTube commenters pointed out that another YouTube astrologer made a
prior to his; he was purloining her stuff. At that time
DiCocco acknowledged it in posts
(since deleted) where he groused that another astrologer might have
So the "cosmos" had to copy another astrologer whose prediction ended
up a bust.
These posts on the "attack" thread, not yet deleted, refer to DiCocco's
copycat attempts at divination:
To read more on DiCocco: www.GianPaolo-DiCocco.com